Not great, but good enough to smile and enjoy
Never have actors worked so hard to save a script from oblivion! The plot is about a movie with a poor plot. Kinda recursive. It's more a stage play than a movie.
But, the acting is superb. William Holden is atheletic. Audrey Hepburn just uses her eyes better than most actors can act their entire bodies. Bit, it is Tony Curtis who steals the show, playing a badly-acting Tony Curtis. I'd watch it again just to see him doing his method acting with two chairs and a pair of gloves. Almost made me cry!
Audrey Hepburn
So happy to receive this CD which was lost so long ago from my collection. Now its complete I played it again and enjoyed it just as much as first time around - although favourite is Roman Holiday.
Tedious in the extreme
The only good thing about this film is Hepburn's luminous beauty, perfectly showcased in Givenchy dresses. Otherwise it's lame, boring, and dull, dull, dull. What a waste of two great actors.
Paris when it sizzles
As this was a present for a friend I personally did not watch this film, but my friend said it was a great film and enjoyed it very much.
Get the Audrey Hepburn Boxset
This film sizzles. Many criticise the chemistry but this is not a love at first sight film this is a winning of a girl's heart from a younger more handsome man.
Full of charm and craft and more humour than any other Hepburn film.
My wife and I simply fell in love with this story and it is now our favourite Audrey Hepburn film and it shares alot of similarities with our second favourite Roman Holiday. William Holden is not as good as Gregory Peck, but then again very few can match him. I felt that some of the lack of charm in the performance seemed to reflect the character; a cynical, heavy drinking 'hack' who finds a new passion for his work and life.